On an Escarpment Above the St. Croix River (The Ear)
Various species of birds twitter
and whistle, telling something or
other to each other of which
I am mostly ignorant. But
listening in is important because
it confirms one realization—
communication is not exclusively human.
Birds do it. Trees do it.
Biologists have shown that trees
communicate through the roots.
Communication is everywhere on this planet
even though humans have pretended
for so long that it is their exclusive domain.
Animals are not dumb. Neither are plants.
And I doubt the dirt beneath
my feet is dumb, either.
What's unusual in this world isn't life,
but inertness. Does this concept point
to anything real? Even the air
is alive with microbes. That is clear.
But is the air alive with itself?
Could those molecules—oxygen, hydrogen,
water, and so on—somehow be
communicating, too? It may seem
mentally imbalanced to think so,
but just a few decades ago
people who thought trees communicated
were considered a little loo-loo.
Anthropocentrism may have had its day,
but only after exacting extreme
damage on the larger plants and animals
and most Indigenous peoples across
the planet. What is animism?
To me, it refers to someone
who believes spirit inheres in material
things. Personally, I can't believe
in spirits, and this has, no doubt, to
do with the accidents of my place and time
of birth. Most humans through history
have believed in spirits, such as
the Judeo-Christian God. So it's normal.
But I can't. Rather, I'm becoming more and more
convinced that something like meanings
subsists in matter, that matter,
of a sort, talks to itself in its way.
First, some humans thought communication
was their special province.
Then they thought meaning
was their special province.
Perhaps neither is. Don't trees communicate
something akin to meaning, thereby
creating it? And if trees do it,
why not the dirt, the air, the light?
What is the moon saying to itself
within itself? I doubt it's actually
talking to us humans: there's no reason
to think we would be central
to its concerns. But we can overhear,
as we overhear birds and their meanings.
And that meaning comes as a sort
of incomprehensible song. Is everything
some sort of complex, multifarious chorus,
where everything sings, with no
conductor, with no center, a kind
of vast, evolving improvisation
with nooks and crannies, eddies and wonders?
If so, humans cannot come close
to hurting the vastness of meanings. We can only hurt
those meanings associated with the
larger plants and animals, such as ourselves.
Things go on perfectly well
without us—meanings will go on
generating forever, if time even makes
sense anymore in such a context.
I am high above the St. Croix River
but back, so I cannot see the water.
Some bird makes a strange gurgling sound
I have never heard before.
Some human visitors to the park
I sit in speak in a language
I don't understand. Human music
is a pale substitute for the
ongoing improvisation about me
and within me. Right now, everything
seems to be singing—the dirt, the
asphalt, my browning apple core—
and the effect is a little overwhelming,
yes, but mostly calming. Am I
making all this up? Am I
projecting my hope for a living
universe upon the inert face of
it all? Perhaps. But to believe
this conventional view would be to doubt
my own ears. I don't want
to do that. I like my ears.
I mean to treat them with respect.
What is this ear that hears
the musical murmurs, these beckonings
toward a home I have always had
but never, until recently, noticed?
It is not one of the ears attached to either side
of my head. It is not even a human ear.
It is outside me, but not exactly,
because it is inside me, too.
It hears everywhere and, because it is everywhere,
it is nowhere, too. It hears without hearing
because it hears. This is the ear
that is not an ear because it is
an ear, subsisting both inside and outside
because there is no inside to this hearing
and no outside, either. This is the ear
from nowhere, hearing everything murmur a song.
Is this projection? Perhaps.
But most humans throughout history
have seemed to sense what I claim
to hear. It is the modern West
that's weird, in its assumption of inertness,
it's sense that most of reality is ultimately
dead, and available for processing.
Comments
Post a Comment